Over the Governor’s veto, the New Hampshire legislature passed an “early offers” law for medical malpractice claims. Tort reformer Walter Olson rounds up some commentary, most notably Torts Professor Christopher J. Robinette’s support, but intentionally excluding (dismissing it as “error-filled screed in a Litigation Lobby outlet”) The Pop Tort’s critical piece. In short, the new law sets up a process under which patients can request an “early offer” of a settlement prior to full-blown litigation that is supposed to cover their “economic loss” and then provide a modest sum for pain and suffering.
That sounds like a reasonable idea in theory, but, if the patient turns down the “early offer,” the plaintiff faces a number of penalties, including the requirement that, if they don’t obtain a verdict for 125% or more of the early offer, then they pay the doctor’s or hospital’s full defense costs. Indeed, the patient has to post a bond for the potential value of those defense costs before filing the case. In essence, if a plaintiff asks for the “early offer” but doesn’t accept it, they are then precluded from filing suit, because a lawsuit would simply be too expensive and too risky.
Here’s the critical information you need to know: Olson, Robinette, and other supporters like Dr. Kevin Pho have misunderstood the bill. Here is how they each describe it:
- Olson: “The law establishes incentives for defendants to make offers early in the litigation process that cover plaintiff’s economic losses such as medical bills and lost wages.”
- Robinette: “If extended, the offer must cover all economic loss—medical bills and lost wages. … [F]or the most severely injured patients, the recovery of full economic loss, which is mandatory under early offers, would be an improvement.”
- Pho: “Medical costs and lost wages would be covered.”
These interpretations are all wrong. An “early offer” under the bill would not cover “plaintiff’s economic losses,” it would only cover a small portion of them. It certainly does not cover the patient’s “full economic loss,” it covers a tiny fraction of it. It does cover “lost wages,” but not as any rational person would understand them — it only covers lost wages in the past, and not lost wages going forward due to the patient’s inability to work.
Continue Reading New Hampshire’s Insidious Early Offer Medical Malpractice Law